BayAreaSecure

Ideas & arguments / October 2026

Private AI, independent audits, and peaceful coexistence

We research how Fully Homomorphic Encryption could keep AI conversations private and protect records for independent model audits. These essays explain the technical proposals and the questions of power behind them.

Our central question is who controls powerful intelligence: who may think privately, collaborate, inspect evidence, and help set the rules. The arguments and proposals are ours; the cited studies are the work of their authors.

CoexistencePrivacyAccountability
01Coexistence

Peaceful Coexistence With AI

How can humans and increasingly capable AI cooperate safely? Fair procedures, private thought, and independent evidence give disagreements a peaceful path to resolution.

6 min readRead the essay →
02Private thought

Fully Homomorphic Encryption and the Right to Think

Who can read an unpublished idea—and who gains power when multiple organizations can use AI privately? Our case for privacy, and the risks it creates.

9 min readRead the essay →
03Independent scrutiny

Move the Audit Outside the Model

A model behaves differently when it encounters an audit cue. What could separately recorded calculations tell an investigator?

7 min readRead the essay →
04Limits of intelligence

Can Intelligence Outgrow Cryptography?

Could lattice-based cryptography protect privacy against quantum computers and future superintelligence? We explore the link to learning and quantum cognition.

7 min readRead the essay →